Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute

 
Seismology Research
Bringing together seismology and atmospheric sciences
8. Modeling of the observed data by raytracing
January 2004
Läslo Evers
8.2 Stratosphere and mesosphere: far field sonic boom
In figure 8.2.1, the recording of coherent infrasonic energy, as recorded by the 16 microbarometers of DIA, is shown. The amplitude of the event increases with time, while the frequency content decreases.

Figure 8.2.1: Coherency as a function of time and frequency is plotted in the lower frame. The best beam for the resolved source characteristics is shown in the top frame. The event is identified as a sonic boom occurring above the North Sea at a distance of 205 km from DIA (from cross bearing analysis).

The low frequent energy appears more coherent as it traveled over the array (i.e. highest coherency is found after 275 seconds). We identify this event as a sonic boom which occurred above the North Sea (from cross bearing) at a distance of 205 km from DIA.
In order to explain the recorded data, we model the ray trajectories through a velocity model obtained from ECMWF atmospheric data. Wind and temperature information is available up to a height of 62 km. In figure 8.2.2, the results of this modeling are shown. Infrasonic energy has traveled up to the high stratosphere and low mesosphere, because of the considerable source receiver distance.

Figure 8.2.2: Results of modeling through raytracing. The velocity model is shown in the lower frame. The effective sound speed (wind and temperature effects) in brown, and the temperature depend sound speed, in green, are shown to the right of the lower frame. In white are the various rays plotted. The rays depart from an estimated source height of 10 km, at intervals of 5 degrees from the vertical. The top frame shows the travel times for rays reaching the surface, in red, also the best beam for DIA is plotted in this frame.

Comparison of the effective sound speed and temperature depend sound speed, resp. in brown and green, right of the lower frame in fig. 8.2.2, shows two velocity gradients almost totally controlled by the wind. The first is located at the tropopause, the top of the troposphere around 10 km, the second can be identified at the stratopause, the top of the stratosphere around 50 km. These gradients make they rays turn back to earth due to refraction, as can be seen by looking at the white ray trajectories.
The tropohops, earth-tropopause refractions, are the first to arrive, as follows from the travel time curves in the top frame of figure 8.2.2. Their low amplitude is caused by the multiple refractions and reflections, before arriving at DIA. On the contrary, less energy is lost while traveling via the higher atmospheric paths. High stratospheric and low mesospheric returns, arriving later than the tropohops, show the highest amplitudes in the recording.
The travel times of the high atmospheric arrivals are well modeled. The travel times of the tropohops are underestimated by the model, they appear later in the recording. The unstable troposphere is not well modeled by raytracing through actual atmospheric models.