Based on its N wave form, the energy is identified to result from a plane flying
through the sound barrier. The N wave is formed at a certain distance from the source,
generating the characteristic double bang. The actual wave shape follows from compression
at the front of the plane and expansion of the air at the back. The amplitude of the
N wave (i.e. 5 Pa) is large, indicating a direct or carpet zone arrival.
The source is located through cross bearing. The bearing of DIA is combined with the bearing
obtained in De Bilt (DBN), see figure 8.1.2.
The distance from the source to DIA is 76 km as derived from the cross bearing analysis
shown in figure 8.1.2.
ECMWF atmospheric data is used to build a velocity model of the atmosphere. The data from
ECMWF is validated by balloon measurements at the KNMI in De Bilt. The correlation between
ECMWF and KNMI data gives confidence in the model up to 25 km height. Balloon measurements
are not available for heights larger than 25 km.
The results from raytracing through the atmospheric model are shown in figure 8.1.3. The lower
frame shows the effective sound speed indicated by various colors. To the right of the lower
frame, the effective sound speed (in brown) and temperature depend sound speed (in green) are
plotted. It follows from the velocity model that at a height between 25 and 35 km, a
velocity gradient is present. Therefore, upward traveling rays will refract from
these height, bending towards the surface. The rays are also plotted in lower frame.
The source is locate at 10 km height and emits infrasound through rays at a 5 degree interval
with respect to the vertical.
The travel times for rays reaching the surface are shown in the top frame, in red. The carpet
zone exists up to a distance of 50 km. The zone where the first refracted waves arrive, starts
at 95 km. DIA and its best beam are plotted in the top frame, at a distance of 76 km as follows
from the cross bearing analysis. Although, DIA recorded a clear and strong N wave arrival, it
appears to be located within in the shadow zone. Either the velocity model or applied raytrace
theory fails to explain the clear observation. Accounting for turbulence and/or inhomogeneities
might solve this ambiguity.